Safe recreational water use: standards: harmful algal blooms.
Impact
If passed, AB 835 would require the California Department of Public Health, in conjunction with the State Water Resources Control Board and local health officials, to develop and enforce standards related to recreational water use. These standards will be formulated based on public health needs and take into account input from various stakeholders, including California Native American tribes, thereby ensuring that diverse perspectives and local conditions are considered when establishing safety protocols. The bill stands to significantly improve the safety of recreational water activities across California, particularly for popular lakes and rivers susceptible to harmful algae growth.
Summary
Assembly Bill 835, introduced by Assembly Member Quirk, seeks to establish minimum safety standards for freshwater bodies used for recreational purposes, specifically addressing the threats posed by harmful algal blooms (HABs). Existing laws outline regulations for recreational activities involving bodily contact with water but may not sufficiently protect public health from exposure to hazardous algal conditions. This bill aims to fill that regulatory gap by instituting clear safety protocols that will mitigate health risks associated with algal blooms in water bodies used for recreation.
Sentiment
The general sentiment around AB 835 appears to be largely positive, especially among health advocates and environmental organizations who view the bill as a proactive measure to enhance public safety. Supporters argue that establishing clear water quality standards is essential in preventing incidents of illness linked to harmful algal blooms. However, some concerns may arise regarding the potential costs of implementing these standards and the regulatory burden it may place on local and state water management entities. Overall, the proponents believe that the benefits of improved water safety outweigh the challenges of regulation.
Contention
While there is strong anecdotal support for AB 835, certain stakeholders express cautions about its implementation. Critics may argue about the feasibility of establishing and adhering to new standards, particularly given the variability of algal blooms and the resources required to monitor and maintain water quality effectively. Additionally, some local governments could be concerned about the added regulatory oversight that might limit their own management practices. The discussion surrounding this bill is likely to balance the need for safety against the practical implications of enforcing broader regulations across numerous freshwater systems in California.