Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SR227

Introduced
6/10/21  
Introduced
6/10/21  
Passed
6/10/21  

Caption

Requests the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court to make recommendations for the redistricting of election sections of the court.

Impact

If enacted, the recommendations from the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court will lead to adjustments in the election districts from which judges are elected. This is significant for ensuring that the electoral districts are aligned with the current population and that they comply with legal standards established for electoral processes. The implications of such changes will directly influence electoral fairness and the representation of communities within the judicial framework.

Summary

Senate Resolution 227 urges the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court of Louisiana to provide recommendations for redistricting the court's election sections following the release of the 2020 federal decennial census data. The resolution seeks to ensure that the election sections, which are crucial for the election of judges in the district, reflect the updated demographic data from the census. By requesting these recommendations, the Senate aims to uphold fair representation within the judicial system and adapt to the changes in population distribution within the district.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR 227 is largely positive, as it demonstrates a proactive approach from the legislature to ensure that the judicial districts are in sync with demographic changes. Legislators express confidence that redistricting will enhance the integrity of the electoral process, allowing for fairer representation of constituents in judicial matters. The resolution received unanimous support during its voting, indicating a collective acknowledgment of its importance.

Contention

Although the bill passed without opposition, discussions around such resolutions often raise points of contention regarding the capacity for effective representation and potential impacts on local governance. Critics may argue about the risks of gerrymandering or the adequacy of the judicial court's recommendations. However, for SR 227, the consensus appears to favor moving forward with a transparent and demographic-based approach to judicial district redistricting, aimed at bolstering electoral integrity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA SR228

Requests the Twenty-Third Judicial District Court to make recommendations for the redistricting of election sections of the court.

LA SR233

Requests the Fourth Judicial District Court to make recommendations for the redistricting of election sections of the court.

LA SR232

Requests the Fourteenth Judicial District Court to make recommendations for the redistricting of election sections of the court.

LA SR226

Requests the Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court to make recommendations for the redistricting of election sections of the court.

LA SR234

Requests the First Judicial District Court to make recommendations for the redistricting of election sections of the court.

LA SR229

Requests the Nineteenth Judicial District Court to make recommendations for the redistricting of election sections of the court.

LA SR230

Requests the Sixteenth Judicial District Court to make recommendations for the redistricting of election sections of the court.

LA SR231

Requests the Fifteenth Judicial District Court to make recommendations for the redistricting of election sections of the court.

LA SR236

Requests the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal to make recommendations for the redistricting of election districts of the court.

LA SR237

Requests the Third Circuit Court of Appeal to make recommendations for the redistricting of election districts and sections of the court.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.