California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1505

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Report Pass
3/14/19  
Report Pass
3/14/19  
Refer
3/18/19  
Refer
3/18/19  
Report Pass
4/1/19  
Refer
4/2/19  
Refer
4/2/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/22/19  
Engrossed
5/22/19  
Refer
5/23/19  
Refer
5/23/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Report Pass
7/5/19  
Report Pass
7/5/19  
Refer
7/5/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Refer
7/10/19  
Refer
7/10/19  
Refer
8/19/19  
Refer
8/19/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/10/19  
Enrolled
9/10/19  
Chaptered
10/3/19  
Passed
10/3/19  

Caption

Charter schools: petitions and renewals.

Impact

The bill allows chartering authorities to deny renewal of charters if they find that a charter school is unlikely to successfully implement its proposed educational program due to fiscal or governance issues, or if it's not adequately serving all students wishing to attend. Furthermore, it imposes a temporary moratorium on new charter schools offering nonclassroom-based instruction from January 1, 2020, to January 1, 2022, which aims to limit the establishment of new charter schools during a period of review and stabilization in the charter school system.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1505, known as the Charter Schools Act of 1992, introduces significant amendments to the Education Code concerning the establishment and operation of charter schools in California. The bill revises procedures for submitting petitions to establish charter schools, focusing on a local governance model by requiring that these petitions be submitted only to the governing board of the local school district or the county office of education. This change emphasizes localized decision-making while reinforcing accountability for educational outcomes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding AB 1505 has been mixed, reflecting a spectrum of opinions among stakeholders. Proponents argue that these amendments are necessary to ensure that charter schools meet specified educational and operational standards, thus enhancing the overall quality of education. However, there are concerns from opponents who perceive the bill as potentially restricting educational alternatives and imposing additional burdens on charter schools and their operations, which could limit educational choices available to families.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between regulatory oversight and the autonomy of charter schools. Supporters advocate for stricter accountability measures to protect students and public funds, while critics worry that excessive regulation may undermine the very principles of innovation and flexibility that led to the creation of charter schools. The requirement for all teachers in charter schools to meet certain certification standards by July 2020 is also a point of discussion, as it frames the debate on teacher qualification and governance in charter schools.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB533

Charter schools: establishment of a charter school.

CA SB1380

Charter schools: establishment.

CA SB671

School safety plans: dangerous, violent, or unlawful activities.

CA AB2887

School safety plans: medical emergency procedures.

CA SB10

Pupil health: opioid overdose prevention and treatment: Melanie’s Law.

CA AB1299

School safety: school resource officers: school police officers: school safety plans.

CA AB1507

Charter schools: location: resource center.

CA SB1477

School accountability: independent study, educational enrichment activities, oversight, and audit requirements.