Louisiana Senate Bill SB379

Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/22
• Refer: 3/4/22
• Refer: 3/14/22
• Report Pass: 4/19/22
• Engrossed: 4/26/22
• Refer: 4/27/22
• Report Pass: 5/11/22
• Enrolled: 6/2/22
• Vetoed: 6/27/22

Caption

Prohibits possession of firearms, ammunition, or electric weapons or devices by certain felons. (8/1/22)

Impact

The introduction of SB 379 is expected to reinforce laws against illegal weapon possession among individuals with felony convictions. The changes aim to close gaps in firearm regulations that could allow certain felons to retain access to firearms, which legislators argue is crucial for improving safety in communities. The bill also reflects a proactive approach to reducing crime by addressing potential firearm access for young individuals who have previously committed serious offenses. By tightening restrictions, the bill is a response to increasing public concern over gun violence and accountability for those with criminal histories.

Summary

Senate Bill 379 aims to amend existing Louisiana state law regarding the possession of firearms, specifically addressing individuals convicted of certain felonies. The bill outlines that individuals found guilty of violent crimes, specific types of burglaries, and other defined offenses will be prohibited from possessing firearms or carrying concealed weapons. Additionally, it expands this prohibition to individuals who committed felony-grade delinquent acts involving firearms while aged sixteen or seventeen, and who are under twenty-four years old at the time of the violation. This amendment seeks to enhance public safety by preventing firearms access to those deemed a higher risk due to past convictions.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 379 appears to be predominantly supportive among legislators prioritizing public safety, with a strong emphasis on preventing gun violence. Proponents argue that the bill is essential for protecting communities from individuals who have exhibited violent behavior in the past. However, there may be elements of contention regarding the fairness of restricting second chances for young adults who made serious mistakes in their youth. Critics may express concerns about the potential for overreach and the effectiveness of blanket prohibitions versus tailored rehabilitative measures for young offenders.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB 379 is the consideration of juvenile offenses and the impact on individuals who may have committed crimes as minors. Critics might argue that addressing felony-grade offenses without room for rehabilitation or second chances could be detrimental to youth who seek to reintegrate into society. As the bill seeks to enforce stricter limitations on firearm possession, there are divergent opinions on whether this approach truly reduces crime or simply penalizes individuals without addressing the underlying issues that lead to delinquency. Balancing public safety interests with the rights of individuals who have committed offenses is likely to be a key debate throughout the legislative discussion.