Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment entitled Kirk Waters and Deborah Waters v. United Fire & Casualty et al.
Impact
If enacted, HB 862 will specifically influence how the state administers payments for legal judgments against it. It underscores the importance of adhering to court rulings and signifies that the state must allocate funds to settle such judgments when deemed necessary. This financial appropriation may set a precedent for future judgments, potentially impacting state budgeting processes and legal liabilities. The bill specifies that in cases of conflict between this act and the judgment, the judgment takes precedence, reinforcing the legal framework within which the state must operate.
Summary
House Bill 862, introduced by Representative Jefferson, focuses on the appropriation of funds from the state general fund to settle a consent judgment involving Kirk and Deborah Waters against United Fire & Casualty, Acme Glass & Mirror Co., Inc., and the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development. A total of $10,000 is designated for this payment for fiscal year 2021-2022, emphasizing the state's obligation to fulfill legal judgments in a timely manner. The bill outlines the conditions under which this payment will be made, particularly noting that the judgment should be final and includes provisions for the cessation of interest accrual on the judgment starting from the effective date of the bill.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 862 appears to be generally favorable, especially among those prioritizing accountability in government actions and legal responsibilities. By ensuring that judgments against the state are honored, the bill aligns with principles of good governance and legal integrity. However, some dissent may arise concerning budget allocation priorities, particularly in times of limited state funds, leading to potential debates about resource distribution among competing fiscal needs.
Contention
Notable points of contention in discussions about HB 862 may involve the implications of state fund allocations, especially during budgetary constraints. There may be concerns from certain legislators or constituents regarding whether the appropriation of $10,000 could divert necessary funding from other crucial state programs or services. The bill necessitates careful consideration of budget constraints and legal priorities, potentially prompting broader discussions about the state's fiscal responsibilities and obligations in the context of existing financial limitations.
Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Kirk Waters and Deborah Waters v. United Fire & Casualty, Acme Glass & Mirror Co., Inc., and State of Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development"
Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Lucretia L. Garrett v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al.
Appropriates funds for payment of consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Charles G. Phillips, Jr. et al. v the State of Louisiana et al.