Authorizes and directs the office of state fire marshal to study the current application of the Life Safety and Property Protection Licensing Act relative to persons convicted of felony crimes of violence and felony crimes against property
Impact
The resolution is expected to have implications on state laws governing property protection licensing, particularly as it reviews existing statutes within the Life Safety and Property Protection Licensing Act. By examining the current regulations, it may lead to recommendations for amendments—especially concerning how long ago a felony conviction occurred before a person may then obtain a license in this field. This could significantly alter the landscape for applications from individuals with previously serious felony convictions.
Summary
House Resolution 77, introduced by Representative Edmonston, aims to authorize the Office of State Fire Marshal to study and evaluate the application of the Life Safety and Property Protection Licensing Act concerning individuals convicted of certain felony offenses. This resolution specifically focuses on understanding how existing laws regarding criminal background checks impact the licensing of those wishing to engage in property protection activities. The ambiguity in the current law is intended to be addressed, particularly regarding the timeline between past convictions and the prospects for obtaining a property protection license.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HR77 appears to be generally supportive among those advocating for rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals who have served their time. Proponents may view the resolution favorably as it seeks to empower those with past mistakes who have demonstrated rehabilitation. Nevertheless, there may be contention surrounding the perceived safety implications associated with altering licensing standards for those with felony backgrounds, particularly concerning violent crimes.
Contention
Notably, House Resolution 77 stems from the complexities of balancing public safety with the rights of rehabilitated individuals. Critics may raise concerns about granting licenses to those with severe felony convictions, questioning whether it is safe to allow potentially dangerous individuals into roles related to property protection. The focus of this study will likely emphasize the essential need for a balanced overview of both rehabilitation outcomes and societal safety standards as legislative discussions proceed.
Authorizing the director of alcoholic beverage control to issue certain licenses to persons convicted of certain felonies if such conviction is more than 10 years old.