California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB918

Introduced
2/4/20  
Refer
2/12/20  
Refer
2/12/20  
Refer
5/7/20  
Report Pass
5/12/20  
Report Pass
5/12/20  
Refer
5/12/20  
Refer
5/12/20  
Engrossed
6/11/20  
Refer
6/18/20  
Refer
6/18/20  
Report Pass
8/4/20  
Report Pass
8/4/20  
Refer
8/4/20  
Refer
8/4/20  
Report Pass
8/11/20  
Report Pass
8/11/20  
Enrolled
8/30/20  
Enrolled
8/30/20  
Chaptered
9/30/20  
Chaptered
9/30/20  
Passed
9/30/20  

Caption

Alcoholic beverages: special nonprofit sales license: wine labels.

Impact

The amendments proposed by SB 918 are designed to facilitate increased sales by allowing nonprofit entities to sell wines they have produced or have been transferred from public universities for educational purposes. This could potentially enhance the educational curriculum surrounding viticulture and enology by offering practical experiences related to wine production and sales. Furthermore, the mandatory labeling requirement ensures that consumers are informed about the origins of the wines they are purchasing, which could foster a sense of regional pride and encourage local economic support.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 918, primarily concerning the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, introduces amendments that allow nonprofit entities, specifically those governed under the Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law, to obtain a special nonprofit sales license. This change is significant as it provides previously unrecognized nonprofit public benefit corporations the ability to hold such licenses, expanding the capacity for educational institutions to engage in the sale of wine. The bill also standardizes the labeling requirements for wines bottled after January 1, 2023, specifically those labeled with an American Viticultural Area that is entirely within Mendocino County.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB 918 appears to be positive among educational institutions and nonprofit organizations involved in viticulture. Supporters argue that this bill not only simplifies the existing regulations by clearly defining the scope of eligibility for sales licenses but also supports the educational framework within California's public universities. However, the bill may raise concerns among existing producers regarding competition and the nuances of compliance with the newly specified labeling standards.

Contention

A notable point of contention arises around the exemption of civil or criminal penalties for violations of the labeling requirement under specific circumstances. Critics may argue that this could lead to non-compliance among entities who might see this as a loophole. Furthermore, as this legislation alters previous standards set forth in the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, there may be concerns about how these changes could affect the competitive landscape of the wine industry, especially against established brands not classified as nonprofit.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1009

Alcoholic beverages: wine labels: Mendocino County.

CA AB1617

Wine label requirements: Santa Cruz Mountains.

CA AB2694

Wine labels: Santa Cruz Mountains.

CA SB231

Department of Transportation: transfer of property: Blues Beach property.

CA SB228

Alcoholic beverage control: public schoolhouses.

CA SB1040

Department of Transportation: transfer of property: Blues Beach property.

CA AB3284

Short-term rentals: business licenses: transient occupancy taxes.

CA AB2094

Alcoholic beverage control: public community college stadiums: City of Bakersfield.