Memorializes the Congress of the United States and requests certain federal and state entities to refrain from enacting or adopting laws, rules, regulations, or guidance that restricts the ability of financial institutions from offering products or services to the fossil fuel industry.
Impact
By memorializing Congress and other federal entities, SR223 attempts to ensure that legislation, rules, or regulations do not hinder financial institutions from supporting fossil fuel companies. This resolution, if acknowledged, would uphold the current state laws and practices which favor the continuation of financial services to the fossil fuel sector. It seeks to reconcile the growing divide between environmental regulations and the economic necessity of the fossil fuel industry, particularly when local communities depend on these businesses for jobs and economic stability.
Summary
Senate Resolution 223, sponsored by Senator Fesi, is a formal request to various federal regulatory bodies urging them to refrain from implementing rules that would limit the ability of financial institutions to provide services to the fossil fuel industry. This resolution highlights the significance of the fossil fuel sector to the Louisiana economy, which relies heavily on jobs and resources from this industry. The resolution stresses the need for financial support to sustain the economic viability of fossil fuel businesses amidst increasing scrutiny and disinvestment from large banks.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment supporting SR223 has been positive among legislators who understand the economic ramifications of restricting services to the fossil fuel industry. Advocates argue this resolution is crucial for maintaining job security and ensuring financial resources are available for the industry’s sustainability. However, there is likely contention from environmentalists and progressive lawmakers who criticize such financial support as detrimental to long-term climate goals. Thus, while support appears strong among certain political factions, significant opposition exists based on ecological concerns.
Contention
The primary point of contention surrounding SR223 lies in the balance between economic interests and environmental stewardship. While proponents emphasize the economic stability provided by fossil fuel industries and the potential job losses from reduced financial support, opponents highlight the necessity for a transition to more sustainable energy practices and reducing climate-related risks. The resolution is part of a larger dialogue about state versus federal responsibilities in regulating financial practices relative to carbon-intensive industries.
Memorializes the Congress and requests certain federal and state entities to refrain from enacting or adopting laws, rules, regulations, or guidance that restricts the ability of financial institutions from offering products or services to the fossil fuel industry
Memorializes the Congress of the United States and requests certain federal and state entities to refrain from enacting or adopting laws, rules, regulations, or guidance that restricts the ability of financial institutions from offering products or services to the fossil fuel industry.
A bill to amend the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to prohibit bank holding companies from facilitating fossil fuel production from new sources, or from facilitating transactions that would provide funds for the construction of new or expanded fossil infrastructure that would drive such production, and for other purposes.
State Board of Investment prohibited from investing in companies that boycott mining, energy production, production agriculture, or commercial lumber production; State Board of Investment required to divest from companies boycotting said industries; state agency contracts prohibited; and certain financial institution discrimination prohibited.
Enacting the Kansas protection of pensions and businesses against ideological interference act, relating to ideological boycotts involving environmental, social or governance standards, requiring KPERS to divest from and prohibiting state contracts or the deposit of state moneys with entities engaged in such boycotts as determined by the state treasurer and prohibiting discriminatory practices in the financial services industry based on such boycotts.