Louisiana 2023 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB22

Introduced
3/6/23  
Refer
3/6/23  
Refer
3/6/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Report Pass
4/25/23  
Report Pass
4/25/23  
Engrossed
4/27/23  
Refer
5/1/23  
Refer
5/1/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Enrolled
6/4/23  
Enrolled
6/4/23  
Chaptered
6/8/23  
Chaptered
6/8/23  
Passed
6/8/23  

Caption

Provides relative to soil conservation policy. (gov sig)

Impact

The passage of SB 22 will result in significant changes to how soil conservation is managed in Louisiana, particularly by shifting some responsibilities from Louisiana State University, which previously administered federal soil conservation policy, to a more streamlined state approach. The repeal of the specified inactive provisions will remove obsolete regulations, allowing the state to adopt a more current and effective policy framework that better serves its agricultural community and environmental needs.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 22, introduced by Senator Womack, revises Louisiana's soil conservation policy by amending certain laws and repealing outdated provisions. The bill aims to align state policies with federal soil conservation efforts as outlined in the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act. Through this legislation, the state recognizes the importance of preserving soil fertility, promoting land conservation, and preventing soil erosion, highlighting the necessity for cooperative action between the state and federal government to protect natural resources in Louisiana.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 22 appears to be predominantly positive among agricultural and environmental stakeholders, who view the bill as a progressive step toward enhancing state soil conservation measures. Supporters emphasize the need for effective stewardship of soil resources, which is critical for maintaining agricultural productivity. However, there may be concerns among some groups regarding the implications of shifting roles from university oversight to state management, specifically about maintaining rigorous standards for soil conservation practices.

Contention

While the bill has generally received support, notable points of contention may arise regarding the effectiveness of the new policies and their implementation. Critics may question whether the removal of certain oversight provisions could lead to insufficient protection of soil resources, as previous regulations might have ensured higher compliance or oversight levels. Ensuring adequate funding and resources for state-managed soil conservation initiatives will also be a potential area of debate as these changes take effect.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.