Connecticut Senate Bill SB00256

Connecticut 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/24
• Report Pass: 3/22/24
• Refer: 2/28/24
• Refer: 4/4/24
• Report Pass: 4/10/24

Caption

An Act Concerning Data Governance And Certain Requests For State Agency Data, Records Or Files.

Impact

Upon implementation, the bill will amend existing state laws to facilitate a more regulated and organized method of handling data requests. The provisions of SB00256 would require state agencies to direct data requests to the agencies that originally held the data, thereby potentially reducing delays in accessing public information. This shift is intended to make government more accountable and transparent, though it may place additional responsibilities on state agencies to manage these interactions effectively.

Summary

SB00256, titled 'An Act Concerning Data Governance And Certain Requests For State Agency Data, Records Or Files', aims to streamline the process for requesting and sharing data among state agencies. It establishes clear protocols for data requests directed to originating agencies and clarifies the obligations of agencies that receive such requests. The bill seeks to enhance efficiency and improve access to public records while ensuring that data sharing adheres to existing legal frameworks, notably the Freedom of Information Act.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00256 appears to be cautious, as stakeholders recognize the potential benefits of improved data governance while also voicing concerns about the practical implications. Supporters argue that the bill will enhance public access to records and improve inter-agency cooperation, while critics may fear it could create bottlenecks if agencies do not efficiently manage data referrals. The nuanced nature of data governance means that opinions range from optimistic expectations of transparency to skepticism over bureaucratic complexities.

Contention

There are notable points of contention, particularly regarding the balance between maintaining public access and the fear of bureaucratic overreach. Critics may express concerns about whether the bill adequately protects sensitive information and if it could inadvertently limit access to data. Furthermore, discussions may arise about the enforcement mechanisms for agencies that fail to comply with the new requirements, which could affect the law's overall effectiveness. The ongoing debate highlights the need to ensure both transparency and the safeguarding of personal and sensitive data.