Louisiana Senate Bill SB52

Louisiana 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/24/23
• Refer: 3/24/23
• Refer: 4/10/23
• Report Pass: 4/18/23
• Engrossed: 4/25/23
• Refer: 4/26/23
• Report Pass: 5/16/23
• Enrolled: 5/31/23
• Chaptered: 6/6/23
• Passed: 6/6/23

Caption

Provides for technical corrections beyond the authority of the Louisiana State Law Institute to certain citations in the Administrative Procedure Act as amended by Act 211 of the 2021 Regular Session and Act 663 of the 2022 Regular Session. (gov sig)

Impact

The impact of SB 52 is focused on improving the efficacy of state laws pertaining to the operations of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections and other agencies. By correcting citations and ensuring proper definitions of rulemaking and other operational processes, the bill seeks to enhance transparency and accountability within state agencies. This enhancement is expected to lead to a more consistent application of administrative rules and greater public awareness of agency operations, ultimately fostering better public trust in government actions.

Summary

Senate Bill 52 serves to amend and reenact several sections of the Louisiana Administrative Procedure Act, addressing various regulations and procedures within state agencies. The bill is primarily focused on making technical corrections to the amendments made by previous legislative sessions, specifically addressing issues that fell beyond the authority of the Louisiana State Law Institute. By clarifying existing statutory language, the bill aims to streamline governmental processes and improve regulatory clarity for the public and involved agencies.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 52 was largely supportive, with most legislative discussions emphasizing the necessity of technical corrections to uphold the integrity and function of administrative processes. The bill received a favorable vote in the House, indicating strong legislative backing and a general consensus on the importance of these adjustments. However, as with many legislative changes, there may be dissent from advocates who feel the nuances of certain procedural elements could have further implications for public engagement and oversight.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the broader implications of the bill on agency rulemaking practices and public engagement in administrative processes. While the technical corrections aim to clarify regulatory frameworks, some stakeholders may argue that the simplification of procedures could inadvertently limit public participation or the oversight capacity of regulatory processes. As these discussions unfold, the balance between streamlining operations and maintaining responsive governance will remain a critical topic of debate.