Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00962

Introduced
2/7/23  
Introduced
2/7/23  
Refer
2/7/23  
Refer
2/7/23  
Report Pass
3/10/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Report Pass
5/1/23  
Report Pass
5/1/23  
Report Pass
5/2/23  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Use Of Certain Rodenticides.

Impact

If enacted, SB00962 would significantly affect existing state laws by implementing controlled use of specific rodenticides which could have lasting implications for environmental safety and public health. This includes provisions that allow for usage in invasive rodent eradication programs where necessary to protect threatened or endangered species. Consequently, the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection will be tasked with developing regulations to ensure compliance and monitor potential adverse effects associated with these rodenticides.

Summary

Senate Bill 00962 establishes new regulations concerning the use of certain second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides in the state. The bill mandates the classification of these rodenticides for restricted use and prohibits their sale or distribution starting October 1, 2023. The active ingredients identified in the bill include Brodifacoum, bromadiolone, difenacoum, and difethialone. These measures are intended to mitigate the risks these chemicals pose to non-target wildlife, particularly raptors and other species that could be adversely affected by such rodenticides.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00962 appears to be generally supportive among environmental groups and public health advocates, who highlight the necessity of controlling hazardous substances to protect wildlife and public health. The legislative discussions indicate a consensus on the need for stronger regulations; however, some concerns were raised about how these restrictions may impact pest control practices and effectiveness. The bill garnered a unanimous voting outcome, with 53 in favor, showcasing a significant level of agreement among lawmakers.

Contention

Despite the bill's broad support, there may be contention around its implementation, particularly concerning the balancing of public safety with pest control needs. Critics of such regulations often emphasize the potential for increased costs or challenges in pest management, suggesting that a more nuanced approach may be necessary to address public health without compromising pest control efficacy. Additionally, the requirement for the commissioner to submit a report on the implications of these restrictions raises questions about the practical effects of enforcement and compliance measures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05217

An Act Concerning The Use Of Certain Rodenticides.

CT HB05219

An Act Concerning Standards For The Spraying Of Herbicides Along Railroad Right-of-ways.

CT SB00292

An Act Concerning The Use Of Pfas In Certain Products.

CT HB05228

An Act Concerning The Purchase Of Certain Lands At Agricultural Value.

CT HB05150

An Act Concerning Cannabis And Hemp Regulation.

CT HB05290

An Act Concerning Various Revisions To The Public Health Statutes.

CT HB05235

An Act Concerning The Department Of Consumer Protection's Recommendations Regarding Cannabis Regulation.

CT HB05003

An Act Concerning Child And Family Nutrition.

CT SB00449

An Act Concerning A Study Of State Taxation.

CT HB05004

An Act Concerning The Implementation Of Certain Climate Change Measures.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.