Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01070

Introduced
2/22/23  
Introduced
2/22/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Refer
4/5/23  
Refer
4/5/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Engrossed
5/17/23  
Engrossed
5/17/23  
Report Pass
5/19/23  
Report Pass
5/19/23  
Passed
5/31/23  
Passed
5/31/23  
Chaptered
6/5/23  
Enrolled
6/6/23  
Enrolled
6/6/23  

Caption

An Act Concerning Prosecutorial Accountability.

Impact

The implementation of SB 1070 is expected to significantly alter the landscape of state laws related to criminal justice data collection. The data gathered will inform not only the Division of Criminal Justice but also contribute to insights for the Judicial Branch and related bodies. This heightened focus on data collection may lead to reforms aimed at addressing disparities in prosecutorial actions and outcomes, thus potentially impacting public policy decisions in the future. The bill requires annual appearances by state attorneys before the Criminal Justice Commission to discuss these data points, fostering a strong connection between data collection and accountability.

Summary

Senate Bill 1070, titled 'An Act Concerning Prosecutorial Accountability,' seeks to enhance transparency within the criminal justice system by mandating the collection of detailed, disaggregated data regarding defendants aged eighteen and older involved in various criminal proceedings. The information required to be collected includes arrests, arraignments, case dispositions, and metrics related to plea agreements and diversionary programs. This initiative aims to hold state attorneys accountable by ensuring a clearer understanding of prosecutorial practices and the demographics of individuals in the justice system.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 1070 appears to be supportive among advocates for criminal justice reform and transparency. Proponents argue that the establishment of a system for collecting prosecutorial data aligns with efforts to promote equitable treatment in the justice system. However, there are concerns among some legal experts about potential logistical challenges and the willingness of prosecutors to comply with the increased scrutiny. The bill's reception signals a growing movement towards enhanced oversight in prosecutorial actions amidst broader discussions on social justice and law enforcement practices.

Contention

While there appears to be broad support for the objectives of SB 1070, notable contention exists regarding the practical implications of implementing such extensive data collection requirements. Critics have raised concerns over how the data will be managed, the potential for misinterpretation, and the administrative burden placed on state attorneys. Furthermore, there are discussions on whether the outcomes of such data collection will lead to actionable changes in the policies and practices within the criminal justice system. The bill attempts to balance the need for accountability with the potential challenges that come from rigorous data requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00437

An Act Concerning The Structure Of The Office Of The Child Advocate Within The Office Of Governmental Accountability.

CT SB00426

An Act Concerning Court Operations And Administrative Proceedings.

CT HB05508

An Act Concerning Recommendations From The Juvenile Justice Policy And Oversight Committee.

CT HB05197

An Act Concerning Social Workers.

CT SB00212

An Act Concerning The Revisor's Technical Corrections To The General Statutes.

CT SB00002

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.

CT HB05487

An Act Concerning The Operation And Administration Of The Office Of The Claims Commissioner.

CT SB00331

An Act Concerning State Marshals' Health Benefits.

CT SB00253

An Act Concerning Foreign Political Spending.

CT HB05379

An Act Concerning The Duties Of The State Marshals And The Operation Of The State Marshal Commission And The State Marshals Advisory Board.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.