Connecticut House Bill HB06829

Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/23
• Refer: 3/1/23
• Report Pass: 3/24/23
• Refer: 4/6/23
• Report Pass: 4/13/23
• Refer: 4/18/23
• Report Pass: 4/21/23

Caption

An Act Making Certain Terms In Electronic Book And Digital Audiobook License Agreements Or Contracts Unenforceable.

Impact

The bill will directly influence the contractual dynamics between libraries and publishers, particularly in the way that libraries can acquire and lend electronic materials. By voiding specific restrictive terms, libraries are empowered to loan eBooks and audiobooks without fear of violating publisher agreements. This change is expected to enhance the availability of digital resources to library users, thereby fostering an inclusive environment for reading and education.

Summary

House Bill 6829 establishes that certain terms in contracts or licenses between libraries and publishers regarding electronic literary materials, such as eBooks and digital audiobooks, are unenforceable. This legislative measure aims to facilitate library operations by ensuring that libraries retain the ability to loan these materials without restrictive clauses that may limit their lending processes or operational functions. By doing so, the bill seeks to promote greater access to digital literature for the public.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 6829 appears to be positive amongst library advocates and educational entities, which see it as a step toward improving accessibility within the digital realm. Supporters argue that accessing literature should not be hampered by corporate restrictions that can limit a library's role in serving the community. However, there may be concerns from publishers regarding the enforcement and revenue implications of this shift, although these are less prominently voiced in the available documentation.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to this bill may revolve around the balance of interests between libraries and publishers. While libraries advocate for broad access and user rights to educational materials, publishers may argue that individual funding and access limitations are necessary to protect their financial models. The bill brings to light the ongoing debate over how digital copyright laws intersect with public access to educational resources, prompting discussions on the future of digital lending in libraries.