Louisiana 2023 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HR260

Introduced
6/5/23  
Introduced
6/5/23  
Passed
6/7/23  

Caption

Requests the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure to study certain procedures relative to venue

Impact

If approved, the implications of HR260 could affect how state laws dictate the venue for civil cases involving foreign or alien insurers. Currently, the Code of Civil Procedure specifies that such cases must be filed in East Baton Rouge. The study initiated by this resolution is intended to evaluate whether these provisions should remain intact or if there are grounds to allow greater flexibility regarding jurisdiction to improve accessibility and convenience for litigants. This move could fundamentally reshape how insurance-related disputes are managed within the state.

Summary

House Resolution 260, proposed by Representative Gregory Miller, seeks to authorize the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure to study the venue provisions relative to foreign or alien insurers and the principle of forum non conveniens. The resolution calls for a comprehensive examination of existing laws, particularly focusing on where lawsuits can be filed against foreign insurers, aiming to clarify the legal landscape and ensure fair treatment for all parties involved. The findings from this study are expected to be reported before the next legislative session, which convenes in 2024.

Sentiment

The sentiment around House Resolution 260 appears to be constructive, with support for the study indicating a desire to enhance the legal framework governing civil cases involving foreign parties. Lawmakers and stakeholders are likely to appreciate the initiative for its potential to increase clarity and efficacy in legal proceedings. However, as it progresses, there may be concerns about the adequacy of protections for local claimants and whether changes might inadvertently disadvantage plaintiffs.

Contention

While HR260 is positioned as a necessary study to improve legal proceedings, there may be points of contention regarding how the findings are interpreted and what changes might be proposed. The restriction of where lawsuits can be filed is a significant topic, as altering it could lead to discussions about fairness in access to justice for all parties. Critics might worry that too much flexibility could favor foreign entities at the expense of Louisiana citizens seeking justice.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA HSR3

Requests the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure to study provisions relative to the recovery of attorney fees in civil actions

LA HSR2

Requests the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure to conduct a study relative to landlord and tenant obligations

LA HR143

Requests the House Committee on the Administration of Criminal Justice to study and make recommendations concerning the policies and procedures of high-speed pursuits by law enforcement officers

LA HSR2

Requests the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure to study the liberative prescriptive period applicable to certain actions

LA HCSR10

Requests the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure and the Senate Committee on Judiciary A to study notice of liens under the Private Works Act

LA HB178

Provides for venue for actions involving certain insurers

LA HSR3

Requests the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure to study various aspects of unfair trade practice and consumer protection laws

LA HSR2

Requests the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure to study redacting social security numbers from recorded documents

LA HCSR14

Relative to La. public retirement systems, urges and requests the House and Senate committees on retirement, the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure, and the Senate committees on Judiciary A, B, or C, to study issues related to redesignating beneficiaries by retirees of such systems

LA HCR134

Requests the La. State Law Institute to study procedures relative to the abandonment of civil actions

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.