Louisiana House Bill HB85

Louisiana 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/15/24
• Refer: 2/15/24
• Refer: 3/11/24

Caption

Provides state supplemental pay to public emergency medical services practitioners (OR +$4,860,000 GF EX See Note)

Impact

If enacted, HB 85 would have a significant impact on the compensation of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel across Louisiana. It would ensure that these professionals are recognized for their commitment and contribution to public health and safety. The inclusion of EMS practitioners under the supplemental pay provisions ensures that their financial compensation is more equitable, particularly in comparison to other first responders. Furthermore, the bill is predicated on an effective date contingent upon a separate constitutional amendment, which adds a layer of complexity to its implementation and introduces potential delays in realizing the benefits of the supplemental pay.

Summary

House Bill 85, introduced by Representative Bagley, seeks to amend state law to provide state supplemental pay to public emergency medical services practitioners. The bill proposes a monthly salary supplement of $600 for full-time emergency medical technicians, advanced emergency medical technicians, and paramedics who are employed by political subdivisions of the state and have completed at least one year of service. This compensation is meant to recognize the critical role these practitioners play in maintaining public safety and health, aligning their pay structure more closely with that of firefighters who currently receive similar supplements.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 85 appears positive among supporters who argue that enhanced compensation for emergency medical personnel is overdue, given the essential services they provide. This bill is seen as a step towards better financial support and acknowledgment of the risks undertaken by EMS practitioners. However, concerns may arise regarding budgetary constraints and the feasibility of such salary increases, particularly in the context of state fiscal management. The sentiment reflects a growing recognition of the importance of EMS roles, particularly in light of increasing public health emergencies requiring rapid response.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HB 85 could be the source of funding for the proposed supplemental pay. Critics might raise questions about the allocation of state funds and whether the bill could lead to unintended consequences for the state budget or other public services. Additionally, the bill's requirement that the constitutional amendment be passed to activate the supplemental pay provisions may lead to debates on the appropriateness of linking these two legislative actions. Ultimately, the discourse will likely center on balancing budget realities with the necessity of providing adequate compensation for public health workers.