The changes brought by AB 1663 have significant implications for the conservatorship process in California. By prohibiting regional centers from acting as conservators while allowing them to function as designees, the bill aims to reduce potential conflicts of interest and improve the clarity of roles in conservatorship matters. Furthermore, it mandates that any petition for conservatorship must include any alternative solutions considered by the petitioner, showing a commitment to exploring less restrictive options before resorting to conservatorship. The bill also establishes a new conservatorship alternatives program in each superior court, which will provide necessary information and resources to interested individuals.
Summary
Assembly Bill 1663, also known as the Protective Proceedings Bill, aims to reform the existing guardianship and conservatorship laws in California. The bill enhances the procedures by which conservators are appointed and terminated, placing an emphasis on the rights and preferences of the conservatee. It stipulates that when deciding between equally qualified conservators, the preferences of the conservatee and any prior conservators should be prioritized, promoting a more personalized approach to decision-making in conservatorship cases.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding AB 1663 is generally supportive, especially among advocates for individuals with disabilities. Supporters view the bill as a necessary reform that empowers conservatees and fosters independence through supported decision-making processes. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders regarding the practical implementation of the program and whether adequate resources will be allocated for the new requirements.
Contention
One notable point of contention is the balance between providing necessary protective measures for individuals unable to make decisions for themselves and preserving their autonomy. While supporters of the bill argue that it enhances the rights and self-determination of conservatees, critics worry that if not implemented properly, the reforms may inadvertently complicate existing processes or create new barriers in accessing justice. Legal professionals and conservatees' families may have differing opinions on how these changes could affect traditional practices related to guardianship.