California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1892

Introduced
2/9/22  
Introduced
2/9/22  
Refer
2/18/22  
Refer
2/18/22  
Report Pass
3/23/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  
Refer
4/18/22  
Refer
4/18/22  
Refer
5/4/22  
Refer
5/4/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/9/22  
Report Pass
6/9/22  
Refer
6/9/22  
Refer
6/9/22  
Refer
6/20/22  

Caption

Medi-Cal: orthotic and prosthetic appliances.

Impact

The proposed adjustments to Medi-Cal reimbursement rates are expected to improve access to necessary orthotic and prosthetic appliances for low-income individuals, particularly for amputees. Often, beneficiaries have no other choice but to rely on outdated or ill-fitting technology, which can lead to serious mobility and health complications. This bill seeks to rectify the inadequacies of the existing payment structures that do not cover the full costs of these critical medical devices, thereby allowing for better access to healthcare for the most vulnerable populations.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1892, known as the California Orthotic and Prosthetic Patient Access and Fairness Act, aims to amend the existing provisions related to the reimbursement rates for prosthetic and orthotic appliances under the Medi-Cal program. The bill requires the reimbursement for these appliances to be set at least at 80% of the lowest maximum allowance determined by the federal Medicare program, ensuring that rates are adjusted annually as necessary. This change addresses the rising costs associated with the production and supply of these essential healthcare items, which have increasingly gone unaddressed by current Medi-Cal reimbursements.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 1892 appears to be supportive among patient advocacy groups and healthcare providers who emphasize the importance of adequate reimbursement to ensure patient safety and independence. Nevertheless, there may be concerns expressed by those who worry about the potential financial implications for the state budget, indicating a debate around fiscal responsibility versus patient care needs.

Contention

Opposition to AB 1892 may arise from potential budgetary constraints associated with increased reimbursements. Critics may argue that while the bill aims to improve accessibility for patients, the financial repercussions for the Medi-Cal program budget could be significant. The push for amendments in reimbursement policies often raises questions of prioritization in state spending, especially in a system already facing fiscal challenges.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A3856

Requires health benefits coverage for additional orthotic and prosthetic appliances under certain circumstances; requires coverage for orthotic and prosthetic appliances obtained through podiatrists.

NJ S1439

Requires health benefits coverage for additional orthotic and prosthetic appliances under certain circumstances; requires coverage for orthotic and prosthetic appliances obtained through podiatrists.

CA AB479

Workers’ compensation: permanent disability apportionment.

AZ HB2302

Insurance coverage; prosthetics; orthotics

WV SB30

Requiring medically necessary care and treatment to address congenital anomalies associated with cleft lip and cleft palate

HI SB606

Relating To Hearing Aids.

HI HB1144

Relating To Agriculture.

HI HB935

Relating To Hearing Aids.