Although the bill's changes are described as nonsubstantive, they reflect a careful examination of the existing laws surrounding the governance of the Department of Water Resources. By streamlining the language regarding the appointment of the Director—which remains contingent on the Governor's choices and Senate confirmation—the bill maintains the existing oversight structure while potentially enhancing accountability through clearer guidelines. Such amendments symbolize a commitment to ensuring proper governance and management of critical state resources.
Summary
Assembly Bill No. 2368, introduced by Assembly Member Bloom, seeks to amend Section 120 of the Water Code related to the Department of Water Resources in California's Natural Resources Agency. The bill proposes to make nonsubstantive changes to existing provisions governing the structure and appointment of the Director of Water Resources. The overarching goal is to ensure clarity and precision in the language used throughout the legislation, which, while not altering the functions or powers of the Department, aims to enforce an improved regulatory framework.
Contention
Notably, since AB 2368 focuses on administrative adjustments rather than substantive policy changes regarding water management or resources, it experiences limited contention. The bill directs attention away from more controversial water laws that often fuel debate, such as allocation and environmental impact matters. However, opposition may arise if there are perceptions that these standard amendments inadvertently pave the way for future legislative changes that could alter governmental authority or resource allocation within the department.