California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2899

Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Refer
4/21/22  
Refer
4/21/22  
Report Pass
5/4/22  
Report Pass
5/4/22  
Engrossed
5/12/22  
Engrossed
5/12/22  
Refer
5/12/22  
Refer
5/12/22  
Refer
5/25/22  
Refer
5/25/22  
Report Pass
6/9/22  
Report Pass
6/9/22  
Refer
6/9/22  
Refer
6/9/22  
Enrolled
6/30/22  
Enrolled
6/30/22  
Vetoed
7/19/22  

Caption

California Hazardous Substances Act: misbranded and banned hazardous substances: hearing procedure.

Impact

The amendment to Section 108390 of the Health and Safety Code represents a significant shift in how the state approaches the management of hazardous substances. By requiring more extensive public notifications and a structured court process for dealing with misbranded or banned substances, the bill aims to improve the effectiveness of public health protections while ensuring that those potentially affected are made aware of the actions being taken against these substances. This also underscores a commitment to rigorous regulatory enforcement.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2899 introduces amendments to the California Hazardous Substances Act specifically addressing the procedures surrounding misbranded and banned hazardous substances. The bill mandates that when such substances are detained, the State Department of Public Health must initiate forfeiture proceedings in superior court, which involves petitioning for a judgment to condemn and destroy the substances in question. A notable change proposed by the bill is increasing the posting period for the public notice required for such proceedings from 14 days to 21 days, enhancing transparency and public awareness around hazardous substances issues.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB 2899 appears to be positive, particularly among public health advocates who support measures aimed at ensuring safety from hazardous substances. The enhancements to notification protocols reflect a proactive approach towards public safety. However, there may be concerns among industry stakeholders about the implications of extended legal processes and potential operational impacts on businesses involved in the manufacture and sale of substances that may be subject to these new provisions.

Contention

While the sentiment is largely favorable, potential contention may arise from industry representatives who view the increased notification requirements as burdensome or excessive. They may argue that such procedures could hinder operational efficiency and delay necessary actions concerning product recalls or management. The balance between ensuring public health safety and maintaining streamlined processes for businesses is likely to be a critical point of discussion as the bill is implemented.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB668

Commercial feed: violations: administrative penalty.

CT SB00514

An Act Concerning The Health Emergency Response Operations Act.

CA AB3252

Animal health.

HI HB427

Relating To Biosecurity.

CA AB2223

Cannabis: industrial hemp.

CT SB00037

An Act Concerning The Accreditation Of The Office Of The Chief Medical Examiner.

CA SB1346

Surplus medication collection and distribution.

HI SB1100

Relating To Biosecurity.