Design-build contracting: cities, counties, and cities and counties: compliance with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Impact
By expanding the scope of the design-build contracting authority, SB 1354 enables local entities to address accessibility challenges more efficiently. The legislation, effective immediately upon approval, allows for quicker response times in implementing necessary modifications to public buildings and infrastructure to meet ADA requirements. However, it also raises concerns regarding the potential increase in perjury cases as the bill expands the scope of liability for certified submissions under the design-build procurement process.
Summary
Senate Bill 1354, introduced by Senator Jones, modifies the Public Contract Code by authorizing cities, counties, and city-county governments in California to utilize the design-build contracting process for projects necessary for compliance with construction-related accessibility standards under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This bill facilitates the construction of accessible facilities, thereby improving public access and ensuring compliance with federal standards for individuals with disabilities. The measure seeks to streamline the contracting process for local governments undertaking these critical projects.
Sentiment
General sentiment surrounding SB 1354 appears to be favorable, particularly among advocates for disability rights and accessibility. Supporters praise the bill for its proactive approach to improving public infrastructure for individuals with disabilities. However, there are also voices of caution regarding the increased accountability and legal ramifications for local agencies that may arise from the expanded definition of perjury linked to the implementation of this legislation.
Contention
A notable point of contention within the legislative discourse is the provision stating that no reimbursement will be required of local agencies for costs incurred under this act. By stating that costs associated with creating or eliminating crimes, or modifying penalties are not subject to reimbursement, the bill places additional financial responsibilities on local agencies. Critics argue this could strain their budgets while attempting to comply with enhanced accessibility requirements.