Delaware Senate Bill SB320

Delaware 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/6/24
• Engrossed: 6/12/24
• Refer: 6/6/24
• Refer: 6/13/24
• Enrolled: 6/26/24
• Passed: 9/19/24

Caption

An Act To Amend Title 24 Of The Delaware Code Relating To The Board Of Speech/language Pathologists, Audiologists, And Hearing Aid Dispensers.

Impact

The passage of SB320 is expected to bring substantial changes to the operational landscape for practitioners of speech and language pathology. By allowing speech/language pathology assistants to work under the supervision of licensed professionals, the bill not only increases the workforce available to assist in therapy but also sets forth standards for qualifications and practice. This is anticipated to alleviate current service shortages, thus improving outcomes for individuals in need of these therapies, particularly in educational settings.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 320 aims to amend Title 24 of the Delaware Code to establish a new licensing category for speech/language pathology assistants. This legislation is particularly significant as it addresses the ongoing shortage of speech/language pathology services, especially in public schools across Delaware. By creating a structured licensing framework for assistants, the bill intends to enhance the availability and quality of support services provided to patients who require speech and language therapy, thereby ensuring that these essential services are more effectively delivered within the community.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB320 appears to be generally positive among stakeholders in the healthcare and education sectors. Advocates argue that the bill is a necessary response to an urgent need for speech/language services, promoting better access and care for students and residents. However, some concerns were raised about the adequacy of supervision and training requirements, which could impact the effectiveness of assistants in practice. Nevertheless, the overall consensus suggests that the benefits of increasing licensed personnel in this field outweigh potential drawbacks.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, notable points of contention include debates around the qualification standards for assistants and the parameters of their supervised practice. Questions have surfaced regarding whether the standards established are sufficient to ensure that these assistants can provide quality support without compromising patient care. Furthermore, some critics argue that easing access to licensure may inadvertently lead to issues related to the competence and readiness of new practitioners in the field.