Relating to the authority of a supporter regarding legal proceedings granted under a supported decision-making agreement.
The bill amends the Estates Code to enhance the framework surrounding supported decision-making agreements, aiming to empower individuals with disabilities by providing them with tailored assistance in various areas of life. This includes help regarding essential needs like healthcare and financial management, while retaining the individual's autonomy to make decisions. The introduced amendments reinforce the responsibilities of supporters, emphasizing their duties to act in good faith and avoid conflicts of interest.
Senate Bill 66 addresses the authority of a supporter in relation to legal proceedings established under a supported decision-making agreement. This bill allows adults with disabilities to voluntarily enter into such agreements without undue influence or coercion. The law clarifies that a supporter can assist the adult in understanding their life decisions, accessing relevant information, and communicating their decisions to others, but cannot make decisions on behalf of the adult.
Senate Bill 66 will take effect on September 1, 2025, and its provisions will apply to all supported decision-making agreements established after that date. This legislative change aims to create a more supportive legal environment for adults with disabilities, ensuring that they can receive the help they need while still maintaining their fundamental right to make personal decisions. The ongoing discourse surrounding the bill will be critical as stakeholders seek to balance support with safety.
While the bill is designed to support individuals with disabilities, there may be concerns regarding the potential for misuse of authority by supporters. The bill includes provisions intended to safeguard against abuse or neglect, mandating reporting of any suspected exploitation. However, critics may argue more robust safeguards and oversight mechanisms are necessary to ensure the adult's safety from potential abuses by supporters. Legislative discussions may highlight tensions between empowerment through support and the risk of coercion or manipulation.