Connecticut House Bill HJ00217

Connecticut 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/24
• Report Pass: 3/22/24
• Refer: 3/1/24
• Refer: 4/4/24
• Report Pass: 4/10/24
• Engrossed: 4/30/24
• Report Pass: 5/2/24

Caption

Resolution Ratifying The Proposed Amendment To The Constitution Of The United States Permitting Congress To Regulate Child Labor.

Impact

If ratified, this amendment would enable Congress to implement regulations specifically addressing child labor, establishing minimum age requirements and conditions of employment for minors across the United States. It could significantly impact existing state legislation that governs child labor practices, as federal regulations would have precedence where applicable. This would lead to a more unified legal framework regarding child labor, enhancing protections for young workers and ensuring consistent enforcement of labor standards.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 217 seeks to ratify a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would grant Congress the authority to regulate child labor. This resolution aims to correct a historical oversight from 1924 when a similar amendment was proposed but not ratified by the Connecticut General Assembly. The proposed amendment emphasizes that while Congress can regulate and set limits on the labor of individuals under eighteen years old, it does not aim to undermine state powers, except where necessary to enact federal legislation regarding this issue.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HJ00217 appears to be generally supportive among proponents who believe that ratifying the amendment is essential for protecting children in the workforce. Advocates argue that it would empower the federal government to implement necessary reforms that safeguard minors from exploitative labor conditions. However, there may be some concerns regarding the degree of federal oversight and potential implications for state autonomy over labor regulations. Overall, the discussion has been constructive, focusing on the need for better protections rather than divisive opposition.

Contention

A key point of contention involves the balance of power between state and federal governments concerning labor regulations. While proponents argue that a consistent federal standard is necessary for protecting children, critics may raise concerns about states losing jurisdiction over labor issues that they feel should be handled locally. The historical context of the 1924 rejection also adds a layer of complexity, with some arguing that revisiting this amendment now is a more progressive approach that addresses modern child labor issues effectively.