Alabama House Bill HB71

Alabama 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22
• Engrossed: 2/8/22
• Refer: 2/8/22

Caption

Community development districts, entertainment districts, establishment authorized under certain conditions, Sec. 35-8B-3 am'd.

Impact

If enacted, HB71 is expected to significantly alter existing state laws concerning the sale of alcoholic beverages in designated community development districts. It grants local governing boards the authority to call for municipal or county-wide elections to allow voters to authorize or prohibit the sale of alcoholic beverages within those districts. This could lead to a broader acceptance of alcohol sales in various community settings, helping to foster local economies and generate additional tax revenue from such activities.

Summary

House Bill 71 focuses on the development of community districts and introduces provisions for the establishment of entertainment districts within these areas. This legislation modifies the Code of Alabama regarding the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages, enabling local boards of community development districts to regulate these activities under specified conditions. The bill primarily aims to enhance economic development by attracting tourists and boosting local businesses through the potential expansion of entertainment options, particularly in areas not entirely incorporated within municipal boundaries.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB71 appears to be generally favorable among proponents who see it as a critical opportunity for economic growth and community development. Supporters highlight its potential to revitalize areas that may have limited entertainment options while generating jobs and increasing local revenues. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the implications this could have on community standards and zoning regulations, pointing to a divide between development advocates and community preservationists.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between fostering economic growth and maintaining community integrity. Critics argue that while the bill may attract more business and tourism, it could also lead to negative consequences such as increased noise, public disturbances, and a loss of local flavor in neighborhoods. The necessity for local referendums is seen as both an empowering mechanism for residents and a potential hurdle, raising questions about the effectiveness of community engagement in such decisions.