Alabama House Bill HB203

Alabama 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/2/22
• Refer: 2/2/22

Caption

State designations, Day of Tears, January 22nd of each year, designated

Impact

If passed, HB203 will formally incorporate the 'Day of Tears' into state laws, which would entail a routine commemorative observance annually. The legislation reflects the state's constitutional support for the rights of unborn children, aligning with Amendment 930 of the Alabama Constitution. By designating this day, the bill seeks to foster awareness and reflection on the issues surrounding abortion, establishing a state-sponsored moment of grief which could have implications for public discourse around reproductive rights and access to abortion services in Alabama.

Summary

House Bill 203 (HB203) aims to designate January 22nd of each year as the 'Day of Tears' in Alabama, commemorating the anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision that recognized access to abortion as a constitutional right. The bill asserts that since the ruling in 1973, more than 61 million unborn children have died, and positions this day as one for mourning these losses. It declares that all state, county, and local government offices must lower their flags to half-staff on this day, and residents are encouraged to do the same. This move is framed as a public policy choice that underscores Alabama's commitment to recognizing and supporting the sanctity of unborn life.

Contention

The introduction of HB203 may spark debates regarding reproductive rights within the state, particularly concerning the implications of commemorating a 'Day of Tears'. Proponents might argue that it serves as an important affirmation of pro-life values and encourages community discussion about the sanctity of life. Conversely, opponents could argue that the designation politicizes a very personal issue and may undermine the rights of those seeking access to abortion services. The bill could thus become a point of contention as stakeholders engage in discussions about the role of state government in personal health decisions and the ongoing national debate over abortion rights.