Alabama Senate Bill SB1

Alabama 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/23
• Refer: 1/18/23
• Report Pass: 3/22/23
• Engrossed: 3/23/23
• Refer: 3/23/23
• Report Pass: 4/5/23
• Enrolled: 4/12/23
• Passed: 4/12/23

Caption

Relating to correctional incentive time; to amend Section 14-9-41, as last amended by Act 2022-322, 2022 Regular Session, Code of Alabama 1975, to reduce the amount of correctional incentive time a prisoner receives; to require a prisoner to remain in a certain classification for a longer period of time before moving up to a higher classification; to provide for additional circumstances in which a prisoner may be required to forfeit his or her correctional incentive time; and to require the Department of Corrections to provide annual reports to the Legislature, the Governor, and the Attorney General regarding correctional incentive time.

Impact

If enacted, SB1 would significantly alter the landscape of state prison policies related to inmate classification and time deductions for good behavior. By reducing the amount of time that inmates can earn for good behavior, the bill places stricter controls on inmate release timelines. The legislation also imposes more stringent criteria for maintaining higher classifications, indicating a shift towards more conservative management practices in correctional facilities. Furthermore, annual reports are mandated for the Department of Corrections to detail changes in inmate classifications and the forfeiture of incentive time, increasing legislative oversight.

Summary

Senate Bill 1 (SB1), also known as the Deputy Brad Johnson Act, aims to modify the rules governing correctional incentive time in Alabama's prison system. The bill proposes to reduce the amount of correctional incentive time prisoners can earn, extending the duration prisoners must remain in specific classifications before qualifying for higher classifications. Additionally, it introduces more circumstances under which a prisoner may lose their correctional incentive time. The main thrust of this legislation is to tighten the management of inmate behavior and the conditions under which they can earn time off their sentences.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB1 appears polarized, reflecting broader national discussions about criminal justice reform. Proponents of the bill, including some government officials, view it as a necessary measure to ensure a safer and more disciplined environment within Alabama's prisons. They argue that stricter regulations are essential for rehabilitating inmates and preventing recidivism. Conversely, opponents, including civil rights advocates, argue that the bill could lead to harsher treatment of inmates and could hinder rehabilitation efforts by providing fewer incentives for good behavior.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential implications for inmate welfare and rehabilitation. Critics are concerned that the reduction of correctional incentive time may lead to overcrowding as inmates serve longer sentences without the possibility of early release for good behavior. This change may disproportionately impact minority groups and those convicted of non-violent crimes. The debate raises fundamental questions regarding the balance between public safety, rehabilitation, and the humane treatment of inmates, mirroring discussions in correctional policies across various states.