The proposed amendments will alter earnings for constables significantly depending on their precinct's workload. For example, constables in precincts with low document service may earn a maximum of $20,000 per year, while those in larger precincts with more registered voters could see salaries that exceed $75,000. This tiered salary structure is designed to reflect the responsibilities and demands placed on constables in various contexts, thereby impacting recruitment and retention in these roles throughout the state.
Senate Bill 1307 proposes amendments to section 11-424.01 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, specifically addressing the salary structure for constables within Arizona. The bill stipulates that the boards of supervisors will determine the salaries for constables based on the volume of documents served in their precincts over the past four years. This legislative change is intended to standardize pay across different precincts based on workload and the size of the registered voter population, which can range significantly based on individual precinct needs and performance metrics.
Reactions to SB1307 appear to be mixed, with proponents emphasizing the necessity of aligning compensation with actual job performance and community needs. This can be perceived as a positive adjustment leading to better servicing of communities. However, there is potential for opposition from those who may see the tiered salary system as unjust or from constables in lower-volume areas who might feel that their compensation doesn’t adequately reflect their efforts or public service.
Notable points of contention revolve around how salary determinations may vary widely based on the arbitrary measure of workload, possibly leading to disputes over what constitutes a fair salary and how districts might manipulate documentation practices to justify salary levels. Additionally, discussions may arise regarding the sufficiency of $20,000 for constables in sparsely populated areas, raising concerns about attracting and retaining quality candidates in under-served communities.