Arkansas Senate Bill SB4

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/5/22
• Refer: 1/9/23
• Failed: 5/1/23

Caption

To Prohibit A Public Entity From Using The Tiktok Application Or Visiting The Tiktok Website On A State-owned Device Or State-leased Equipment.

Impact

If enacted, SB4 would formally amend state law under Arkansas Code Title 21. The act establishes legal definitions and restrictions concerning the use of TikTok on state-owned devices. By implementing this prohibition, the state intends to enhance cybersecurity measures for state operations. The bill aligns with actions taken by other states and federal entities that have already banned TikTok on government-issued devices, reflecting a growing concern about digital security in a globalized tech landscape.

Summary

Senate Bill 4 (SB4) seeks to prohibit public entities within the state from using the TikTok application or visiting the TikTok website on state-owned devices or equipment. The bill is motivated by national security concerns regarding data collection practices associated with TikTok, a platform owned by the Chinese company ByteDance. Proponents argue that the vast amount of user data collected by TikTok can potentially be accessed by the Chinese Communist Party, posing risks to American citizens and infrastructure. This legislation aims to mitigate those risks by restricting access to the app on devices used by state employees and contractors.

Contention

The discussion surrounding SB4 could involve significant contention, as opinions may vary on the perceived necessity and effectiveness of such bans. Supporters claim that such legislation is essential to protect sensitive data and maintain cybersecurity, citing various warnings from federal authorities about the potential risks posed by TikTok. On the other hand, critics might argue that this legislation oversimplifies a complex issue and could hinder public engagement with modern technology. Additionally, some may raise concerns regarding the implications of broadly banning applications based on national security claims without a balanced discussion about the actual evidence of threat.