Arkansas House Bill HB1082

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/5/23
• Refer: 1/9/23
• Report Pass: 1/19/23
• Engrossed: 1/31/23
• Refer: 2/1/23
• Report Pass: 3/1/23
• Refer: 3/6/23
• Report Pass: 3/7/23
• Enrolled: 3/8/23
• Chaptered: 3/13/23
• Passed: 3/13/23

Caption

To Establish The Occupational Therapy Licensure Compact In Arkansas.

Impact

The compact is designed to enhance the ability to provide occupational therapy services, particularly during times when access to care is critical, such as in the wake of disasters or public health emergencies. It enables occupational therapists to render services via telehealth, thereby increasing accessibility, which is vital for clients who may face challenges attending in-person appointments. By establishing a standardized process for licensure across states, the Compact endorses efficient collaboration among states in regulating and providing occupational therapy.

Summary

House Bill 1082 establishes the Occupational Therapy Licensure Compact in Arkansas, allowing occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants licensed in one member state to practice in other member states without needing additional licenses. This legislation aims to improve public access to occupational therapy services while preserving the regulatory authority of the states to ensure public safety. The compact facilitates interstate practice by enabling the mutual recognition of licenses across the participating states, thereby promoting greater flexibility and resource availability for healthcare providers and patients alike.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1082 is generally positive among healthcare providers who advocate for the compact's potential to facilitate improved access to occupational therapy. Many supporters emphasize the benefits of addressing workforce shortages and enhancing mobility for professionals, particularly those who move frequently due to job changes or military obligations. However, there may be concerns regarding the sufficiency of oversight and maintaining high standards of practice across varied jurisdictions.

Contention

A notable point of contention within the discussions revolved around the balance between state and federal oversight of occupational therapy practices. Critics argue that regional standards may be diluted under a compact system, raising concerns about the regulation of practice and accountability. Additionally, there are apprehensions regarding how adverse actions taken against therapists by a home state would be managed under the compact arrangement, particularly how these actions would be communicated and enforced across state lines.