Arkansas House Bill HB1181

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/23
• Refer: 1/23/23
• Report Pass: 2/9/23
• Engrossed: 2/16/23
• Refer: 2/16/23
• Report Pass: 3/1/23
• Refer: 3/6/23
• Report Pass: 3/7/23
• Enrolled: 3/8/23
• Chaptered: 3/13/23
• Passed: 3/13/23

Caption

To Establish The Counseling Compact In Arkansas.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1181 will have significant implications for state laws governing the practice of professional counseling. It is designed to simplify the ability for counselors to practice in multiple states without the need for multiple licenses, which could lead to a broader provision of counseling services. Moreover, the Compact emphasizes the use of telehealth technologies to further increase accessibility, thereby enhancing the delivery of mental health care services across state lines.

Summary

House Bill 1181 is a legislative proposal to establish the Counseling Compact in Arkansas. The Compact facilitates the practice of Licensed Professional Counselors across state lines, aiming to enhance public access to counseling services while maintaining the regulatory authority of individual states over their licensing processes. By establishing a framework for interstate cooperation, the Compact seeks to streamline the licensure recognition process and address barriers faced by counselors, particularly those who relocate frequently, such as active-duty military personnel and their spouses.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 1181 has been supportive, particularly from professional counseling organizations and advocates for mental health care accessibility. Proponents argue that the bill will reduce licensure barriers and expand access to vital counseling services. However, there are concerns regarding the effective enforcement of state regulations and the adequacy of safeguards to protect public health and safety when counselors operate across state lines.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about maintaining state sovereignty over licensure standards and the potential for diminished local oversight of counseling practices. Critics argue that while the Compact aims to enhance accessibility, it could inadvertently lead to inconsistencies in the quality of care provided and might hamper states' ability to address specific local concerns relating to mental health services. Additionally, the implications of telehealth practice in various states, with differing regulations, present another layer of complexity that requires careful consideration.