Arkansas House Bill HB1406

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/13/23
• Refer: 2/13/23
• Report Pass: 2/22/23
• Engrossed: 2/23/23
• Refer: 2/23/23
• Report Pass: 3/7/23
• Enrolled: 3/8/23
• Chaptered: 3/13/23
• Passed: 3/13/23

Caption

Concerning The Regulation Of Certain Battery-charged Fences By Municipalities And Counties.

Impact

The bill has significant implications for public safety and local governance. By limiting the ability of municipalities to regulate battery-charged fences, the legislation centralizes authority at the state level and simplifies the regulatory landscape for property owners. However, it raises concerns about safety standards and the potential risks associated with these types of security measures, particularly in residential areas where they may not be appropriate. The delineation of what constitutes a battery-charged fence and the restrictions on local regulation aim to balance property rights with community safety.

Summary

House Bill 1406 aims to regulate the use of battery-charged fences by municipalities and counties in Arkansas. The bill explicitly prohibits local governments from implementing ordinances that impose additional requirements on the installation or use of such fences beyond existing alarm system regulations. This provision allows property owners to install battery-charged fences without the burden of obtaining additional permits or adhering to stricter operational standards set by local authorities. The intent of this legislation is to streamline the process for property owners seeking enhanced security measures while ensuring compliance with existing safety standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1406 appears to be generally supportive among property owners and some legislators who advocate for minimal governmental interference in personal security measures. Proponents view the bill as a necessary step in enhancing personal security, enabling property owners to protect their property without excessive regulatory hurdles. However, there exists a notable counter-sentiment among some community leaders and safety advocates who fear that the bill may undermine local authority to ensure community-specific safety and risk management.

Contention

Debate around HB 1406 has highlighted a fundamental tension between state regulation and local control. Opponents of the bill argue that restricting local jurisdictions from enacting their safety regulations creates potential hazards, especially in densely populated areas or regions with unique security needs. Concerns were raised that the legislation might lead to misuse or unsafe installation of battery-charged fences, which could pose risks to both human safety and animal welfare. These points of contention underline ongoing discussions regarding the balance between individual property rights and public safety needs.