Arkansas House Bill HB1446

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/23
• Refer: 2/16/23
• Report Pass: 3/16/23
• Engrossed: 3/27/23
• Refer: 3/27/23
• Report Pass: 4/5/23
• Refer: 4/6/23
• Report Pass: 4/6/23
• Enrolled: 4/7/23
• Chaptered: 4/13/23
• Passed: 4/13/23

Caption

To Provide State Oversight Of Quality Of Care Provided To Children In Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facilities And Other Regulated Facilities.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1446 will influence several aspects of Arkansas law relating to the regulation of psychiatric treatment facilities. It sets minimum standards for care, mandates quality assurance reviews, and grants the Department of Human Services the authority to investigate alleged maltreatment in these facilities. This aligns with broader efforts to improve mental health services for children and provide better oversight, with a focus on trauma-informed care, short-term treatment options, and family involvement.

Summary

House Bill 1446 aims to enhance state oversight of quality of care provided to children in psychiatric residential treatment facilities and other regulated facilities in Arkansas. The bill introduces new regulations governing admissions, requiring that children admitted to these facilities either be Arkansas residents or meet specific criteria, including state ward status or being a victim of human trafficking. These measures are designed to prioritize the safety and well-being of children in care and ensure that they receive appropriate treatment.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding the bill have received largely positive feedback. Advocates for child welfare and mental health have praised the bill for its comprehensive approach to ensuring that children receive high-quality care in residential settings. It represents a proactive step in addressing gaps in existing laws and improving child welfare service standards. However, there are concerns about the bureaucratic implications and the capacity of the Department of Human Services to enforce the proposed regulations effectively.

Contention

While the bill is generally well-received, points of contention may arise regarding its implementation and the practicalities of enforcing new standards. Critics may argue that the current healthcare infrastructure may struggle with extensive oversight requirements, leading to operational challenges. Moreover, the definitions and specific scopes of the facilities covered under the legislation could spark discussions about balancing regulation with adequate service provision, particularly for complex cases like human trafficking victims.