Arkansas House Bill HB1474

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/21/23
• Report Pass: 2/23/23
• Engrossed: 2/27/23
• Refer: 2/27/23
• Report Pass: 3/27/23
• Enrolled: 3/29/23
• Chaptered: 3/30/23
• Passed: 3/30/23

Caption

To Amend The Arkansas Criminal Code; And To Add An Underground Storage Facility To The Definition Of Critical Infrastructure.

Impact

The inclusion of underground storage facilities in the definition of critical infrastructure is expected to have significant implications on state laws related to the regulation and safeguarding of such sites. This change will enable law enforcement and relevant authorities to apply heightened security measures to these facilities, enhancing public safety and mitigating risks associated with potential threats or attacks on critical infrastructure resources. Consequently, existing frameworks managing environmental and safety regulations may also require revision to adapt to the new provisions.

Summary

House Bill 1474 amends the Arkansas Criminal Code by incorporating underground storage facilities into the definition of critical infrastructure. This legislative change aims to enhance the security and protection of critical assets associated with energy, telecommunications, and public utilities. By categorizing underground storage facilities as critical infrastructure, the bill emphasizes their importance in maintaining state and national security, particularly concerning the effective operation and management of energy resources and utilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1474 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among stakeholders in the energy sector and public safety organizations that favor enhanced protections for critical resources. However, some concerns may arise regarding the balance between necessary security measures and the potential for excessive regulation that may impact operational efficiencies or local governance over these facilities. Overall, lawmakers and stakeholders recognize the importance of protecting critical infrastructure but remain cautious about the implications of expanded definitions and regulations.

Contention

While the bill was passed without dissent, discussions during its consideration pointed to the need for ongoing dialogue around the appropriate level of regulation applied to these facilities. Some opponents might argue that broadening the definition of critical infrastructure could lead to excessive government oversight or inhibit necessary operational aspects of private enterprises. As the bill moves forward, further exploration of its impacts on local provisions and the balance between safety, regulatory compliance, and business operations will be crucial.