With the implementation of SB083, Colorado's laws regarding the deployment of broadband infrastructure will be significantly impacted. The bill mandates the creation of a uniform electronic application system and fee structure for entities wishing to access these rights-of-way. It is expected that this will streamline processes for non-governmental entities, potentially accelerating broadband deployment across the state. By aiming to eliminate discriminatory practices in public right-of-way access, the bill enhances competition among broadband providers, which could lead to improved service for consumers.
Summary
Senate Bill 22-083 focuses on the utilization of public rights-of-way by broadband providers in Colorado. The bill aims to ensure that telecommunications providers can access public rights-of-way in a manner that is nondiscriminatory and fair. It prohibits exclusive arrangements for the use of these rights-of-way, requiring that all leases be on a same-term basis. In addition, if compensation to the state is provided in non-cash form, a cash equivalent value must be calculated and applied to the agreement. This provision is designed to prevent favoritism and promote equitable access among various telecommunications providers.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment regarding SB083 appears to be positive among proponents who advocate for increased broadband access and equitable treatment of service providers. Supporters argue that reducing barriers to entry and ensuring nondiscriminatory access to rights-of-way will foster a more competitive marketplace, ultimately benefiting residents through better service and potentially lower costs. However, there may also be apprehensions regarding the execution of these provisions and whether they fully address the needs of all stakeholders, including rural and underserved communities.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise around the interpretation and implementation of the nondiscriminatory access provisions. Critics could argue that while the bill aims to be equitable, the true impact on smaller or newer broadband providers needs to be monitored, ensuring they are not inadvertently marginalized by larger companies with more resources. Additionally, the requirement for a cash equivalent for non-cash compensation could lead to disputes or legal challenges regarding valuation, which might complicate the system intended to facilitate easier access to public rights-of-way.