Colorado 2022 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB235

Introduced
4/28/22  
Refer
4/28/22  
Report Pass
5/2/22  
Refer
5/2/22  
Engrossed
5/3/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Report Pass
5/4/22  
Refer
5/4/22  
Report Pass
5/5/22  
Refer
5/5/22  
Enrolled
5/11/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Enrolled
5/25/22  

Caption

County Administration Of Public Assistance Programs

Impact

If enacted, SB235 will significantly influence the management of public assistance programs by requiring counties to adhere to a structured funding model. This model will guide how public funds are distributed for administrative purposes, focusing on improving operational efficiency, timely processing of applications, and overall cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, the bill outlines specific deadlines for review and reporting to ensure continuous evaluation of the system, potentially leading to sustainable improvements in public service delivery at the county level.

Summary

Senate Bill 235 addresses the administration of public assistance programs at the county level in Colorado, proposing a comprehensive framework to enhance the efficiency and accessibility of these services. The bill mandates the state and the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing to conduct a thorough assessment of current practices relating to public and medical assistance. One of the key components of the bill is the establishment of a funding model to determine adequate resources required for effective county administration, ensuring that eligible individuals can access necessary services without undue delay.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB235 appears to be generally positive among the supporters who believe the bill could create a more streamlined approach to public assistance. Advocates for the bill argue that it will facilitate better access to healthcare and social services for Colorado residents. However, there may be concerns from some stakeholders, particularly regarding the implications of a state-imposed funding model and whether it might constrain local decision-making and responsiveness to unique county needs.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB235 may arise from how the funding model is decided and implemented, as some counties could fear that this will limit their financial autonomy. There may also be discussions around what defines the appropriate metrics for evaluating success and efficiency, thus raising questions about alignment with the on-the-ground realities faced by county departments administering these critical programs. The debate will likely focus on balancing state oversight with the need for local adaptability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CO SB059

Children's Behavioral Health Statewide System of Care

CO SB174

Sustainable Affordable Housing Assistance

CO HB1223

Improved Access to the Child Care Assistance Program

CO HB1408

Expenditures for Care Assistance Programs

CO SB012

Reentry Workforce Development Cash Assistance Pilot Program

CO HB1307

HVAC Improvements for Public Schools

CO SB176

Update Medicaid Member Terminology

CO HB1038

High-Acuity Crisis for Children & Youth

CO HB1075

Analysis of Universal Health-Care Payment System

CO SB047

Prevention of Substance Use Disorders

Similar Bills

CA SB514

California Teleconnect Fund Administrative Committee Fund.

CA SB1505

Aircraft registration.

CA SB453

Older adults.

CA AB381

Licensed facilities: duties.

CA AB2268

English learners: initial identification: English language proficiency assessment.

CA SB410

Public postsecondary education: California State University: nonfaculty staff employees: merit salary system.

CA AB1176

Communications: universal broadband service: California Connect Fund.

HI SB719

Relating To Pesticides.