Relating To The Transfer Of Non-agricultural Park Lands.
The bill includes provisions that require both the DLNR and DOA to meet regularly to assess and facilitate future land transfers. It mandates that certain lands currently managed by the DLNR that are not being used for public purposes should be rezoned and eventually transferred. The bill effectively streamlines the administration and management of these lands by clarifying jurisdictional responsibilities. By setting a deadline of December 31, 2023, for the transfer of remaining lands, the bill seeks to resolve ongoing discrepancies that have persisted for years.
Senate Bill 693 relates to the transfer of non-agricultural park lands in Hawaii, aiming to set a firm deadline for the transfer of these lands from the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) to the Department of Agriculture (DOA). The bill references Act 90 from 2003, under which a series of transfers were initiated. However, the bill highlights that many parcels have yet to be transferred and seeks to establish a clear timeline for this process to ensure that land management responsibilities align appropriately with the intended use of these lands.
The sentiment towards SB 693 has been generally positive, especially among those advocating for improved management and utilization of land resources. Supporters argue that centralizing the management of non-agricultural lands under the DOA could lead to more effective agricultural practices and better oversight. However, there are concerns about the implications of such a transfer for conservation efforts and the way land classifications are managed, highlighting the need for balance in land use planning.
Notable points of contention include discussions around how certain lands may be rezoned and the criteria under which lands are deemed appropriate for transfer. Critics may raise issues regarding how this could affect environmental protections and the rights of existing lessees. The requirement for periodic meetings between departments also suggests a need for ongoing negotiation and collaboration, which could become a focus of debate as the implementation date approaches.