Relating To Fish Aggregation Devices.
The bill is designed to address the urgent need for gap funding to maintain the state’s FAD program at full capacity. The financial implications are crucial, as the average cost of replacing a missing FAD is approximately $12,000. The act intends to appropriate funds from the general revenues of Hawaii, which would enable the Department of Land and Natural Resources to effectively manage the FADs. Without this funding, many fishers may face reduced fishing opportunities, increasing their operational challenges and potentially impacting local fish stocks.
House Bill 1930 aims to provide financial support for the maintenance and operation of fish aggregation devices (FADs) in Hawaii. These devices are essential for local fishermen as they enhance fishing opportunities by attracting pelagic species such as tuna. The bill recognizes the challenges posed by the frequent loss and damage of these devices, which not only increase operational costs for fishers but also significantly affect their harvest and community food supply. By ensuring the FAD program is adequately funded, the bill seeks to enhance the sustainability of fishing activities that are critical to local economies.
Discussions around HB 1930 are largely supportive, emphasizing the necessity of maintaining the FAD program for both economic and community health reasons. Local fishermen and fishing associations have expressed approval for the bill, highlighting its potential to ensure the sustainability of fishing practices that are culturally and economically significant to Hawaii. However, there may be some concerns about the long-term funding strategy and reliance on general revenue, suggesting the need for a more secure and diversified funding approach in the future.
While the bill primarily receives positive support, it raises questions regarding accountability and the effectiveness of funding allocation over time. Critics may point to the need for a comprehensive strategy to prevent future losses of FADs and address the challenges in their deployment and maintenance. Furthermore, the timing of the bill’s effectiveness, set for July 1, 2050, suggests a significant delay in implementation, which could lead to ongoing issues for local fishers if immediate support is not provided.