Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB2422

Introduced
1/26/22  
Refer
1/28/22  
Report Pass
3/3/22  
Engrossed
3/8/22  
Refer
3/11/22  
Refer
3/15/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
4/8/22  
Enrolled
4/22/22  
Chaptered
6/17/22  

Caption

Relating To Sentencing.

Impact

The passage of HB2422 would amend several sections of Hawaii Revised Statutes, implementing more stringent requirements on judges presiding over domestic violence cases. Under the updated statutes, courts would be required to impose intervention programs as part of the sentencing, regardless of whether the offender is placed on probation. This adjustment aims to enhance accountability and ensure that victims receive necessary protection and support.

Summary

House Bill 2422 addresses the sentencing framework for domestic violence cases within Hawaii's legal system. The bill aims to clarify the authority of family courts to impose mandatory domestic violence intervention for individuals who violate restraining orders or engage in abusive behaviors towards family or household members. Historically, such interventions were ordered as conditions of probation, but the bill seeks to establish that such interventions may be mandated independently of probationary conditions. This change is largely in response to the Hawaii Supreme Court's interpretation in a prior case that the legislature found to be erroneous.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding House Bill 2422 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among advocates for domestic violence prevention. Proponents argue that the new structure will better protect victims by ensuring they receive necessary intervention without leaving the decision to the often discretionary nature of probation. However, there may also be concerns surrounding the application of mandatory sentences and the flexibility judges might lose in managing unique cases.

Contention

Despite the overall support, there might be points of contention regarding the bill's implementation, particularly among defense attorneys who may argue that mandatory interventions could limit judicial discretion in certain cases. Concerns may also be raised about the adequacy and availability of intervention programs, as imposing such requirements without sufficient support structures could prove counterproductive.

Companion Bills

HI SB3166

Same As Relating To Sentencing.

Previously Filed As

HI SB1604

Relating To Anger Management.

HI HB1965

Relating To Abusive Litigation.

HI SB2604

Relating To Abusive Litigation.

HI HB584

Relating To Probation.

HI SB904

Relating To Probation.

HI SB1204

Relating To Reducing The Harms In The Sex Trade.

HI SB2685

Relating To Abusive Litigation.

HI HB2657

Relating To Abusive Litigation.

HI HB1199

Relating To Domestic Violence.

HI SB223

Relating To Probation.

Similar Bills

HI SB2345

Relating To Crisis Intervention.

KS HB2236

Establishing the mental health intervention team program in the Kansas department for aging and disability services in state statute and providing incentives for coordination between school districts, qualified schools and mental health intervention team providers.

CA AB1975

Medi-Cal: medically supportive food and nutrition interventions.

KS HB2669

Codifying the mental health intervention team program administered by the Kansas department for aging and disability services in state statute.

CA SB481

Successor agencies: assets: disposal.

HI SB1594

Relating To Crisis Intervention.

HI SB1594

Relating To Crisis Intervention.

HI HB2250

Relating To Crisis Intervention.