Hawaii Senate Bill SR95

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/22
• Refer: 3/16/22
• Report Pass: 4/6/22
• Passed: 4/7/22

Caption

Affirming Hawaii's Ongoing Commitment To The Goals Of The Paris Climate Agreement, The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, And Endorsement Of The Fossil Fuel Non-proliferation Treaty.

Impact

The resolution signifies Hawaii's alignment with international climate goals and frames the state as a proactive participant in the global effort to combat climate change. It calls for collective action to endorse the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, which aims to halt new fossil fuel exploration and phase out existing production. This initiative corresponds to broader objectives shared among states and nations focused on achieving net-zero emissions by mid-century, creating a legal and cultural shift towards prioritizing renewable energy and sustainability.

Summary

Senate Resolution 95, introduced during the Thirty-First Legislature of Hawaii in 2022, affirms the state's ongoing commitment to the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement and endorses the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty. This legislative move comes in response to the pressing realities of climate change and the need for substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. The resolution emphasizes Hawaii's acknowledgment of the detrimental impacts of fossil fuel expansion and the importance of transitioning towards sustainable energy solutions to mitigate these threats.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR95 appears to be largely positive, particularly among environmental advocates and climate change activists who view it as a crucial step towards environmental justice. However, the resolution also raises significant concerns regarding the economic implications for regions reliant on fossil fuel industries. While supporters celebrate the commitment to climate goals, critics may perceive it as a threat to local economies and job security tied to fossil fuel sectors, highlighting a complex debate around economic stability versus environmental responsibility.

Contention

As the resolution calls for a transition away from fossil fuels, it invites discussion around the effects such a shift could have on local and state economies. Some stakeholders argue that this transition could jeopardize jobs and economic growth in sectors dependent on fossil fuels, while advocates assert that a green energy transition presents new opportunities for employment in burgeoning markets. Furthermore, the resolution's strong call to action may stir contention among legislators focusing on the balance between environmental commitments and economic realities.