Hawaii Senate Bill SCR173

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/22
• Refer: 3/16/22

Caption

Urging The Department Of Land And Natural Resources To Construct And Operate Non-chemical, Mineral-based Sunscreen Dispensers At All State Beaches.

Impact

The implementation of SCR173 could significantly enhance efforts to safeguard Hawaii's coral reefs by promoting the use of safer sunscreen alternatives. By encouraging the availability of mineral-based sunscreens at state beaches, the resolution aims to reduce the chemical load on fragile marine ecosystems. Furthermore, it seeks to address accessibility issues for both residents and tourists, ensuring that those visiting the beaches can easily obtain reef-safe sunscreen options. This could lead to increased awareness and usage of eco-friendly personal care products among beachgoers.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution 173 (SCR173) urges the Department of Land and Natural Resources of Hawaii to construct and operate non-chemical, mineral-based sunscreen dispensers at all state beaches. The resolution arises from concerns about the harmful effects of chemical-based sunscreens on coral reef ecosystems, highlighted by studies showing that certain chemicals can inhibit plant growth, deform marine life, and contribute to coral bleaching. A previous legislative act, Act 104, already restricted the sale and distribution of specific harmful chemical sunscreens, reflecting a growing recognition of the need to protect the natural environment in Hawaii.

Contention

While supporters of SCR173 emphasize its environmental benefits, there have been concerns about the current limitations regarding the availability of approved non-chemical sunscreens in Hawaii. Critics argue that despite the potential positive outcomes of expanding access to mineral-based sunscreen, there may not be enough supply to meet the demand of residents and visitors alike. Additionally, financial considerations regarding funding the installation of the dispensers—suggested to come from marine license fees and fines—could lead to budgetary debates on prioritization within the Department of Land and Natural Resources.