Hawaii Senate Bill SR218

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/22
• Refer: 3/16/22
• Report Pass: 4/6/22
• Passed: 4/7/22

Caption

Requesting The Department Of Human Services To Develop Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Plus Specific Training Guidelines For State Agencies That Serve And Assist Survivors Of Intimate Partner Violence.

Impact

If implemented, SR218 aims to significantly modify how state agencies approach intimate partner violence, ensuring that responses are more inclusive and cognizant of the unique challenges faced by LGBTQ+ survivors. The proposed guidelines would require input from relevant advocates and professionals, fostering an environment of collaboration and awareness. By equipping state workers with the necessary skills and knowledge, it intends to increase support and improve health outcomes for LGBTQ+ individuals affected by intimate partner violence.

Summary

Senate Resolution 218 (SR218) was introduced in the Thirty-first Legislature of Hawaii, addressing a critical gap in services for survivors of intimate partner violence, particularly among LGBTQ+ individuals. The resolution requests the Department of Human Services to create specific training guidelines for state agencies that serve these survivors. The impetus for the resolution comes from empirical evidence indicating that LGBTQ+ individuals experience intimate partner violence at higher rates than heterosexual individuals yet face significant barriers to reporting and receiving help. The training is aimed at enhancing understanding and sensitivity towards this community within state services.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SR218 is largely supportive, especially from advocates for LGBTQ+ rights and social justice communities. Proponents argue that the proposed training guidelines could lead to transformative change in how survivors are treated, ultimately reducing feelings of alienation and improving access to vital support services. However, there may be local government officials or members of the public who could express concerns about the implementation logistics and funding for such initiatives, which may lead to some contention.

Contention

While SR218 has garnered support for its intentions, it also opens discussions around the allocation of resources for training and the effectiveness of existing programs in supporting LGBTQ+ survivors of intimate partner violence. Opponents may argue about the feasibility and prioritization of such training within state budgets, suggesting that without adequate funding, these initiatives might not be sustainable or effective. The resolution highlights the ongoing dialogue within Hawaii's legislative framework about the importance of addressing violence against marginalized communities.