Requesting The Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission To Convene A Task Force To Examine And Make Recommendations Regarding Existing Procedures Of The Hawaii Paroling Authority Setting The Minimum Terms Of Imprisonment.
Impact
The bill's primary objective is to increase the efficiency of the state’s criminal justice system by potentially reforming the processes related to parole. Currently, Hawaii is the only state among 33 that uses an indeterminate sentencing model which requires a separate hearing by the parole board to set minimum sentences. This resolution could lead to significant changes in how minimum terms are determined, possibly allowing the paroling authority to focus more on the rehabilitation and supervision of parolees rather than on setting minimum terms.
Summary
HCR23, or the House Concurrent Resolution No. 23, requests the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission to convene a task force aimed at examining and making recommendations regarding the existing practices of the Hawaii Paroling Authority in setting the minimum terms of imprisonment for individuals eligible for parole. The resolution recognizes Hawaii's unique two-step process that involves both the presiding judge and the paroling authority in determining minimum sentences, which has been pointed out as redundant and time-consuming. It seeks to evaluate potential modifications to streamline these procedures.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HCR23 appears to be one of cautious optimism, as it aims to improve the operational effectiveness of the paroling system. Legislators and stakeholders may see this as a step towards reforming the criminal justice system in Hawaii and eliminating inefficiencies. However, there may also be underlying tensions regarding how such changes could affect victims and the judiciary, underscoring the complexity of reforming established processes within the legal system.
Contention
One notable point of contention may arise around the task force’s recommendations on whether the responsibility of setting minimum sentences should be removed from the paroling authority entirely. Stakeholders, including legal professionals and advocacy groups, might engage in debates about the implications for justice and public safety, particularly concerning the balance between rehabilitative efforts and protecting community interests.
Same As
Requesting The Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission To Convene A Task Force To Examine And Make Recommendations Regarding Existing Procedures Of The Hawaii Paroling Authority Setting The Minimum Terms Of Imprisonment.
Requesting The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs To Identify The Scope Of Native Hawaiian Cultural Appropriateness For The Purpose Of Addressing Native Hawaiian Disparities.
Requesting The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs To Identify The Scope Of Native Hawaiian Cultural Appropriateness For The Purpose Of Addressing Native Hawaiian Disparities.
Urging The Hawaiian Homes Commission To Consult Beneficiaries Of The Hawaiian Homes Commission Act Regarding Alternative Waitlist And Award Prioritization Based On Lineal And Generational Descendancy For Hawaiian Home Lands Located In Hana, Maui.
Requesting The Women's Corrections Implementation Commission To Develop A Strategy And Make Recommendations To Reduce The Number Of Women Incarcerated At The Women's Community Correctional Center By Twenty-five Percent Over The Next Five Years.
Requesting The Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission To Convene A Task Force To Examine And Make Recommendations Regarding Existing Procedures Of The Hawaii Paroling Authority Setting The Minimum Terms Of Imprisonment.
Requesting The Judiciary To Convene A Task Force To Examine And Make Recommendations Regarding Existing Procedures Of The Hawaii Paroling Authority Setting The Minimum Terms Of Imprisonment.
Requesting The Judiciary To Convene A Task Force To Examine And Make Recommendations Regarding Existing Procedures Of The Hawaii Paroling Authority Setting The Minimum Terms Of Imprisonment.