Hawaii Senate Bill SCR168

Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/23
• Refer: 3/15/23
• Report Pass: 4/4/23
• Engrossed: 4/5/23
• Refer: 4/11/23

Caption

Requesting The Legislative Reference Bureau To Summarize The Laws In Other States That Provide For A Continuous Legislative Session.

Impact

If enacted, this resolution could lead to significant implications for Hawaii's legislative procedures. Increasing the number of session days could enhance the efficiency, productivity, and transparency of the Legislative process, allowing legislators more time to deliberate on issues and engage with their constituents. This change could potentially attract more public advocacy and facilitate a more inclusive policymaking environment, thereby contributing to a democratic process that is more responsive to citizen needs. Moreover, it may create opportunities for legislators to become better informed about the issues they are addressing.

Summary

SCR168, introduced in the 2023 legislative session, is a Senate Concurrent Resolution aimed at improving the participation of citizens in the legislative process of Hawaii. The bill requests the Legislative Reference Bureau to summarize existing laws in other states that provide for continuous legislative sessions throughout the year. This proposal stems from concerns that the traditional legislative session schedule, which typically runs from January to May, is too compressed, limiting public participation and advocacy efforts during that time. By enhancing understanding of how other states operate, the bill seeks to facilitate discussions around potential changes in Hawaii's legislative practices.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR168 seems generally positive, with proponents advocating for greater accessibility and participation within the legislative framework. Supporters argue that extending the legislative session could allow for more thorough consideration of policies and address pressing issues more effectively. However, challenges may arise in balancing the workload and funding associated with extended sessions, and concerns about legislative burnout among lawmakers could surface. Additionally, there may be hesitance from those who prefer the traditional structure and timeline.

Contention

Notably, while the resolution does not impose a direct change to the existing laws, it sets the stage for critical discourse about legislative effectiveness. The call for a comprehensive study of other states’ continuous session laws indicates an awareness of varying legislative practices and an openness to reform. The outcomes of this request will play a crucial role in determining the feasibility and desirability of implementing a continuous legislative session in Hawaii, leading to discussions that may highlight differing opinions on the need for maintaining established practices versus innovating for better public engagement.