The bill does not introduce new provisions for local governments or change existing policies significantly; rather, it seeks to enhance clarity in the legal framework surrounding missing persons cases. By updating the terminology within the existing act, the bill aims to eliminate potential confusion regarding the short title and ensure that it effectively communicates its purpose. Although largely administrative, such changes are important for the proper function of legislative documents and their interpretation.
Summary
SB1109, introduced by Sen. John F. Curran, proposes a technical amendment to the Missing Persons Identification Act. The primary focus of the bill is to effectuate a change in the language used in the short title of the Act. This is a procedural adjustment rather than a substantive change to the underlying laws or regulations concerning missing persons. While the technical amendment may seem minor, it reflects the ongoing effort to keep state law current and clear for both public officials and the community.
Contention
There are no notable points of contention publicized regarding SB1109, as it serves a technical purpose and does not involve controversial discussions or significant changes to policy. Its reception is expected to be largely non-contentious since it does not alter the substantive law regarding missing persons or local government authority.