If adopted, the amendment would fundamentally alter the budgetary dynamics at the federal level, placing greater financial control in the hands of the President, similar to the authority already held by governors in 44 states. Proponents argue that this change is necessary to enhance fiscal responsibility, curb excessive spending, and give the executive branch the tools to manage Congressional appropriations more effectively. The resolution underscores a belief among supporters that the current system unduly limits financial oversight by the executive, potentially leading to fiscal mismanagement and waste.
Summary
House Concurrent Resolution H7057 proposes an application to Congress to call a constitutional convention with the specific aim of amending the Constitution. The proposed amendment would authorize the President of the United States to veto specific items of appropriation while approving other parts of a bill, effectively granting line-item veto power to the presidency. This initiative is framed as a response to the lack of sufficient presidential control over federal appropriations and an attempt to address ongoing concerns regarding unchecked federal spending and the growing national debt, which surpassed $34 trillion as of 2024.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding H7057 reflects a mixture of urgency and skepticism. Supporters view the resolution as a necessary step toward fiscal reform and enhanced governmental efficiency, bolstering the President's ability to eliminate wasteful expenditures. Conversely, opponents may perceive this move as a centralization of power that undermines Congressional authority, as well as a potential threat to the checks and balances that safeguard against executive overreach. This tension showcases a broader ideological battle over the distribution of power between state and federal governance systems.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the constitutional implications of calling a convention, particularly concerns over the potential for unintended consequences that may arise from such a process. Critics warn that a constitutional convention could open the door to far-reaching changes that extend beyond the original intent of H7057, possibly impacting various rights and governance structures. This apprehension is compounded by historical precedents where constitutional conventions have led to significant changes, raising fears about the risks involved in shifting the balance of power towards the presidency.
Applies to congress to call a convention pursuant to Article V of the U.S. Constitution to propose an amendment regarding a presidential line item veto for appropriation bills
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.
(Constitutional Amendment) Requires legislative approval of a proposed constitutional amendment in two sessions before being submitted to the electors for ratification