To shorten the review period for the congressional review of termination of certain national emergencies, and for other purposes.
Impact
If enacted, HB 868 would significantly alter the procedural dynamics of how national emergencies are addressed at the congressional level. By requiring Congress to act more swiftly, the bill aims to ensure that emergency declarations do not linger without regular oversight. This could lead to a more accountable government response to emergencies, promoting transparency and legislative participation in significant national decisions.
Summary
House Bill 868 proposes to amend the National Emergencies Act by shortening the review period that Congress must adhere to when considering the termination of certain national emergencies. The bill seeks to streamline the legislative process by mandating a more expedited evaluation and vote on whether an emergency declaration should remain in effect. This amendment emphasizes a more proactive approach from Congress in handling ongoing emergencies, potentially reducing the delay between declarations and legislative responses.
Contention
There are potential concerns associated with this bill regarding the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches. Critics may argue that hastening the congressional review process could undermine the thoroughness with which emergencies are evaluated, posing a risk of premature terminations that may not fully consider the ongoing impact of such emergencies on public safety and national security. As such, discussions around the bill may reveal differing viewpoints on the balance between efficiency and thorough deliberation in governance.
National Security Reforms and Accountability Act National Emergencies Reform Act Arms Export Control Reform Act War Powers Resolution Modernization and Accountability Act
To provide that certain communications projects are not subject to requirements to prepare certain environmental or historical preservation reviews, and for other purposes.
Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2023 This bill revises provisions relating to congressional review of agency rulemaking. Specifically, the bill establishes a congressional approval process for a major rule. A major rule may only take effect if Congress approves of the rule. A major rule is a rule that has resulted in or is likely to result in (1) an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. The bill generally preserves the current congressional review process for a nonmajor rule.