Us Congress Senate Bill SJR23

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/23
• Refer: 3/30/23
• Engrossed: 5/15/23

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Marine Fisheries Service relating to "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habitat".

Impact

The resolution passed in the Senate on May 11, 2023, with a narrow majority, indicating significant division among legislators on matters of environmental regulation and conservation efforts. By disapproving the rule, SJR23 aims to prevent these regulations from being enforced, which supporters argue will streamline regulatory processes and promote economic interests, particularly in industries potentially affected by stringent conservation laws.

Summary

SJR23 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a rule established by the National Marine Fisheries Service regarding the regulations for listing endangered and threatened species and designating critical habitats. This resolution reflects a legislative maneuver under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, allowing Congress to exercise oversight on federal regulations perceived as overreaching or potentially problematic. The rule, published in the Federal Register, has raised concerns regarding its implications on wildlife management and conservation efforts across the United States.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR23 showcases deep polarization on environmental issues. Proponents of the resolution, primarily from the Republican side, advocate for a more business-friendly regulatory environment, claiming that the existing rules hinder economic growth and development. In contrast, opponents express grave concerns over the potential harm that reversing these rules could inflict on endangered species and the ecosystems they inhabit, emphasizing the need for stringent protections and sustainable practices.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the balance between economic interests and environmental protections. Supporters of SJR23 highlight the necessity of legislative oversight in curbing what they view as overregulation by federal entities. Meanwhile, environmental advocates argue that such disapproval could lead to increased risks for vulnerable species, undermining decades of conservation efforts. This debate mirrors larger national conversations about the appropriateness of regulatory measures in the context of economic development.