Us Congress Senate Bill SB1674

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/18/23
• Refer: 5/18/23

Caption

No START Treaty Act

Note

The bill underscores the broadening recognition that emerging military technologies and the shifting geopolitical landscape necessitate a reassessment of traditional arms control frameworks and nuclear deterrence strategies.

Impact

If enacted, SB1674 would modify the criteria under which the United States can negotiate nuclear arms agreements. The President would be prohibited from agreeing to any treaty that allows Russia to possess a nuclear arsenal at parity or higher compared to the U.S. arsenal unless comparable restrictions are placed on China. This signifies a shift towards prioritizing U.S. strategic interests in comparison with adversaries and could alter the dynamics of future international nuclear arms negotiations. The bill aims to establish a more robust framework for assessing and improving the United States' nuclear defense posture amidst evolving global threats.

Summary

SB1674, also known as the No START Treaty Act, is a bill aimed at enhancing the security and accountability of the United States' strategic and non-strategic nuclear arsenals, particularly in relation to the arsenals of the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China. The bill stems from growing concerns that existing arms control treaties like the New START Treaty do not effectively limit the nuclear capabilities of these countries, especially in light of China's substantial nuclear arsenal growth and Russia's apparent non-compliance with treaty obligations. The bill emphasizes a need for more stringent standards in any future arms control negotiations.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding SB1674 involve debates over the effectiveness of arms control measures and their impact on national security. Proponents argue that the bill would protect U.S. interests against the backdrop of today's complex nuclear landscape, ensuring that the U.S. is not at a strategic disadvantage. However, opponents may contend that the bill could hinder diplomatic avenues for arms control and could escalate tensions with nuclear powers. Critics also raise concerns that abandoning or renegotiating treaties could lead to an arms race, undermining global stability.