Us Congress House Bill HB3617

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/23/23
• Refer: 5/23/23

Caption

To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the authority to provide a wig and treat traction alopecia under the TRICARE program, and for other purposes.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would directly impact military health policies by formalizing regulations that allow for the coverage of wig provision and treatment for traction alopecia within the TRICARE framework. Additionally, it mandates the Secretary of the military branch to develop training materials that inform service members about the potential health issues associated with certain hair care practices, thus promoting awareness and preventative measures. This indicates a shift toward a more inclusive approach to health care that recognizes the unique physical and psychological needs of military personnel regarding their grooming habits and hairstyles.

Summary

House Bill 3617 seeks to amend Title 10 of the United States Code, specifically to expand the authority under the TRICARE program to provide wigs and treatment for traction alopecia. Traction alopecia is a form of hair loss caused by the prolonged strain on hair due to various hairstyles. This bill represents an essential effort to enhance military healthcare and address specific health concerns relevant to service members, particularly those affecting their appearance and overall well-being. The legislation aims to ensure that members of the armed forces have access to necessary medical interventions for this type of hair loss, which can be particularly prevalent among individuals who frequently wear tightly gathered hairstyles.

Contention

The bill is poised to address a notable gap in existing military healthcare provisions, but it may also face scrutiny regarding funding and resource allocation for the enhanced coverage. Questions may arise about the extent to which the TRICARE program can sustain expanded services, especially in light of budgetary constraints and competing healthcare needs. Furthermore, there could be debates concerning the appropriateness of covering cosmetic aids in the military context, as some may argue that it presents a diversion from more pressing health issues.